PDA

View Full Version : Snipers of WWII


PZIV
09-02-2006, 05:59 PM
I've seen Enemy at the Gates, and I loved it. I've heard everything about Vasily, but I often wonder where German, or other nation snipers were in the whole war. So I did a little research and here is what I've found.

First off, it seems the German soldiers thought sniping to be less honorable (which to an extent I agree). They did have some, but not many were in the SS, most were in the Wehrmacht.

The SS had very few snipers as they viewed this role as a dishonorable way to fight, this was left for the Wehrmacht.

Also, I did some more research and not only in Wikipedia. Wikipedia shows that Vasily had around 930 verified kills, but that number seemed way to high. I took looks at other sites and found them to be actually much lower. Still a very good sniper, but there were many other snipers, especially Soviet one's that were better.

Soviet propaganda was rife with fictitious stories to boost morale during a time when the war was so uncertain. (on the topic of Vasily kill count)

Vasili Zaitsev W.W. II U.S.S.R. 400 (list of kill counts from an other source)

All of his 242 verified kills were all made in the period of a few months, from October of 1942, soon after he arrived in Stalingrad, up until the time he was wounded by shrapnel in January of 1943 (an other source)

Okay, now that I've done some research, it seems as though, for one, Vasily did not have as many kills as he is claimed to have had, and two, it was made up (in a good strategy) by the Soviet propaganda minister. He has the 14th highest kill ranking in the war, and by no means the best. Many Soviet snipers are ahead of him, but yet they are not mentioned.

Alright, we've cleared that up, so let's move on to the other nations snipers and why they are not mentioned so much.

Simo Häyhä is was a Finnish sniper that ranked 1st in the list of snipers.

was a Finnish soldier, and is widely considered to be the most successful sniper in history.

All of Häyhä's kills were accomplished within three months prior to injuries caused by an enemy bullet. Before his injury, the Russians tried several plans to get rid of him, including counter snipers and artillery strikes. Their best result was tearing the back of his coat away with shrapnel, but leaving Häyhä himself unscratched.

Finnish frontline figure from the battle field of Kollaa places the number of Häyhä's sniper kills at 542.

and it was in the Kollaa area were the famous battle of "Killer Hill" took place with 32 Finns battling 4,000 Soviet soldiers. These were the hunting grounds of Simo Häyhä and it should be noted that even against massive odds the Kollaa positions were still in Finnish hands at the end of the war

Also, there was an other Finnish sniper that ranked ahead of Vasily. His name was Sulo Kolkka.

During 105 days of combat Kolkka was credited with more than 400 enemy kills as a sniper in the Winter War.

Now, for the German snipers in the war. As I stated earlier, the Germans did not always find it honorable to be a sniper. In fact, they almost detested it. There were however many great snipers. One is the famous Erwin Konig. He was the major that Vasily "killed" and took his sights, but the funny thing is. There is absolutly no records in the German archives of this man.

Major Erwin König was named by the Soviets as the best German sniper during World War II, with more than 400 kills. While Soviet sources pitted him against Vasily Grigoryevich Zaitsev in their propaganda of the time

...been found in any German records, and historians are sure he never actually existed

It also says Vasily claims that the Konig was a sniper of the SS, but there were no SS divisions in Stalingrad, as well as the fact that snipers were looked down upon especially in the SS. Also, he is called a Major, but the German military believed snipers were not fit to lead, but instead just fight. This again leads me to believe, there is no such thing as a "great duel" Vasily won.

Now I looked for Soviet snipers (there were many) that were better than Vasily.

I found the name Ivan Mihailovich Sidorenko stand out a lot, but I can't find ANY information on the man himself? I search and find his numbers, but no info on the man himself, which seems strange to me. Possibly an other Soviet propaganda attempt? Alright, maybe he's just not easy to find, especially on Wikipedia, so I search for the second ranked on. His name is Nikolay Yakovlevich Ilyin. Again! I can't find anything on that man either! I don't know what to say here folks.

Anyway, I have to take a shower now, but I'll leave you with this bit of information. Hopefully it'll be educational to you all, and hopefully wont ruin Enemy at the Gates for you!

relax 1.0
09-03-2006, 04:20 AM
I do believe that there was a great sniper duel i stalingrad, but who the german sniper was we may never know - perhaps it was hitler himself? On a serious note, i do believe vassily/vassili did get a high kill count. Nobody can be sure of how many soldiers he killed, nobody was with him 24/7. And even if he counted, who is to say that the loliness and coldness could not have gave him mental lapses?

Alpha_Pasta
09-03-2006, 05:22 AM
I've read about him in Anthony Beevor's Stalingrad. I can see if I can get the total there if you want...

BritishBulldog1
09-03-2006, 06:13 AM
Don't believe everything that you read in Wikipedia. Someone from here directed me to a page there where they reckon it proved the Russians won the war. After a heavy battle, I won and the piece was reworded to reflect it was just Stalins view, based on the number of Germans they killed and the number of Soviet losses. Unfortunately, I don't have the link since my re-format, otherwise I would have posted it.

It's a shame. Wikipedia was a good idea, but the self indulgent, biased and nationalistic practices of the few (in this case Russians) has ruined the whole idea. Having proven one thing wrong leads me to question the whole thing.

BB1

Alpha_Pasta
09-03-2006, 08:15 AM
Undoubtebly you are correct. For political topics I need for school I would never use wikipieda. The risk of bias is just too big.

However. Recently I was looking up information on the Luftwaffe. I found that wikipedia was the best place to find detailed facts about most of their planes.

PZIV
09-03-2006, 08:32 AM
Yes, unfortunetly this is true and whoever made the Wikipedia article, in my opinion guessed way too high for the kill count. Funny thing was, the person who posted that number gave sources that were linked in the article, that were other websites, but those websites showed the exact opposite of what he claimed! Oh well, Vasilly was a great sniper, but he just didn't have as many kills as many people would think and deffinetly, Simo Häyhä was the best sniper in WWII.

EDIT:That's why I edited the Vasily page on Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasily_Grigoryevich_Zaitsev#Life

He might re-edit though, whoever did it first.

catman
09-03-2006, 01:20 PM
yeah, he just keeps telling me on aim that vasilly sucks and he shouldnt have gotten recognition, and frankly, im tired of it.
does anyone know how a sniper proves his kill? Dog tags. at the end of 1945 he had brought home about 924 dogtags. He killed about 3-400 officers. So that means about 500 of his verified kills were footsoldiers. Historians though, estimate that he really killed about 1300 germans. We will never know the excact ammount, because he probably missed over a hundred dogtags.

BritishBulldog1
09-03-2006, 02:07 PM
Catman, can you really see a sniper wandering deep into enemy held territory, across a no mans land first, to collect the dog tags of a dead German he shot and killed? Generally speaking, the dead soldier's comrades would have collected them first and returned them to the relatives.

Of course, it's also possible that he just collected the tags off any dead German he could find, assuming that they were still on the dead person.

BB1

catman
09-03-2006, 02:13 PM
Catman, can you really see a sniper wandering deep into enemy held territory, across a no mans land first, to collect the dog tags of a dead German he shot and killed? Generally speaking, the dead soldier's comrades would have collected them first and returned them to the relatives.


BB1

thats EXACTLY my point, that he had more kills than just his 924 verified

BritishBulldog1
09-03-2006, 02:25 PM
And my point is that he would not have collected tags from soldiers he had personally shot, it would have been far too dangerous. Collecting tags from dead germans after they had been over run though, would seem to be far more plausible an explanation, in which case he could have simply collected dog tags from anybody, including those that had never entered his sights. In other words, his claims could be totally fictitious.

BB1

catman
09-03-2006, 02:27 PM
In other words, his claims could be totally fictitious.

BB1

As could be the other snipers' kills.

BritishBulldog1
09-03-2006, 04:34 PM
Yes, that is very true Catman, they could be.

BB1

PZIV
09-03-2006, 04:59 PM
yeah, he just keeps telling me on aim that vasilly sucks and he shouldnt have gotten recognition, and frankly, im tired of it.
does anyone know how a sniper proves his kill? Dog tags. at the end of 1945 he had brought home about 924 dogtags. He killed about 3-400 officers. So that means about 500 of his verified kills were footsoldiers. Historians though, estimate that he really killed about 1300 germans. We will never know the excact ammount, because he probably missed over a hundred dogtags.

When did I say anything on AIM about this? I for one still say more than 200 kills by oneself is very good and he was the great story of his time, but I just think he get's too much recognition. There is no way he had that many kills. Also, I always wondered why other Soviet snipers who were better than him didn't get recognition.

I never said anything about this on AIM except that I posted this thread. Other than that nothing.

Bulldog makes a great point. Collecting dogtags was a stupid idea, and allowed for much embelishment.

EDIT: But we have to remember, the Soviet propaganda targeted the snipers to gather support to defeat the Germans. It would be more possible for Soviets to embelish then other nations.

MFKR
09-03-2006, 07:25 PM
Of corse the ruskies lied, they were desperate in the begining years of the war. Not the gratest of liars, but regardless im sure Vassili was a fine sniper.
As to of there being no records of Major. Konig, thats news to me. I read a book about the famous dual that enemy at the gates was based on, which said major konig was the head instructor at the main sniper school in Germany, and was sent to Stalingrad to take out Vasilli. Thats all i really remember.
I personally belive the finns were the best soldiers of WWII as a whole.

Dascoo
09-03-2006, 07:43 PM
On the topic of snipers....who knows what special thing a canadian sniper did :)

PZIV
09-03-2006, 08:00 PM
Not I. Enlighten us?

MFKR
09-03-2006, 09:08 PM
Guilie suit?

Savage
09-08-2006, 06:03 AM
got the longest kill ever recorded??? hehe i think thats the answer

Oshiri
09-08-2006, 10:58 AM
it's possible that the soviets even manufactured the dogtags..

dont get me wrong, being a sniper takes guts. i heard somewhere that snipers have the shortest average lifespan of any soldier on the battlefield. Unfortunatly, Soviet propaganda was, and still is so effective that we are still struggling with it. Their mastery was that they mixed truth with lies to gain the desired effect.. the "hitler has one testicle" myth.. is it a piece of Soviet propaganda? it certainly sounds like it. Yet im told time and time again by my schoolmates that "NO HE REALLY DID HAVE ONE TESTICLE!"

to them i say: prove it.


why am i jabbering on about hitler's nuts? :S

catman
09-08-2006, 05:07 PM
why am i jabbering on about hitler's nuts? :S

he had nuts?

Pulse
09-08-2006, 06:10 PM
I believe parts of it, but I doubt that someone can count how many kills they can get...

Also this sounds like a good game of Call of Duty 2 in Stalingrad, Russia with over 100 Russians and 200 germans ! And just for fun, the map is bigger.

Pulse

Oshiri
09-09-2006, 05:09 AM
yea lol that would own B)

Savage
09-09-2006, 05:48 AM
i bet the russki's all had ppsh that could fire countuly with no jamming up. :p

Oshiri
09-09-2006, 07:17 AM
yea, and the germans had aimbot..

undaunted
10-09-2006, 08:17 AM
tbh most of enemy at the gates was complete poop, in other words it was completely unrealistic and many things didnt happen, or things that did were killed by the movie.

btw the duel probably never happened if it did it would have lasted hours-days and the reporter guy would have been dead if he even got near hed be dead.

so mostly, the sniper battle if it did happen, was nothing like the movie. plus if ur looking up major konig, itd help if u knew his german rank cuz they didnt have majors :3 they were some ccrazy thing thats impossible to say

Alpha_Pasta
10-09-2006, 10:50 AM
Enemy at the gates is different. Its romancy, and most war films don't have that.

PZIV
10-10-2006, 07:54 PM
tbh most of enemy at the gates was complete poop, in other words it was completely unrealistic and many things didnt happen, or things that did were killed by the movie.

btw the duel probably never happened if it did it would have lasted hours-days and the reporter guy would have been dead if he even got near hed be dead.

so mostly, the sniper battle if it did happen, was nothing like the movie. plus if ur looking up major konig, itd help if u knew his german rank cuz they didnt have majors :3 they were some ccrazy thing thats impossible to say

Yes I know the German ranks, but in English terms it would be equivelent of "Major" and the point was snipers were not ranked that high as they were not fit to lead according to the Wehrmacht and SS.

Savage
10-11-2006, 02:48 AM
and u can see why they lost

PZIV
10-11-2006, 04:42 PM
and u can see why they lost

No I can not. Please explain?

Savage
10-12-2006, 04:48 AM
by not letting people who would be able to see the battle field and able to command troops around and help win

Oshiri
10-22-2006, 10:14 AM
that's not the point, Snipers were seen as loners, and anyway, how could you command a battle while lying perfectly still..?

Savage
10-23-2006, 01:55 AM
hmm good point. but i wonder wether it was vasily himself boasting about how many kills or wether it was the command saying how good he was. because if u ask american snipers how many germans they killed they probly wont be to comfitable telling u, as the thought of killin them disturbs them. but then again the russians hated the germans more then anyone except maybe the polish and it might not have affected them in the same way

Oshiri
10-23-2006, 04:26 AM
actually i think that his kills were massively exagerated in a Soviet propaganda stunt, to increase war morale.

Savage
10-23-2006, 04:33 AM
wouldnt encourage me

Oshiri
10-23-2006, 06:32 AM
why? you wouldn't like the idea of a "hero" on your side?

MidnightRider
10-23-2006, 08:28 AM
All warfair has had its "heros". Men that raised the moral of the troops. Achilles, Spartacus, Hercules and Hector to name only a few from the distant past of war. When these men entered combat the word spreed through the entire army that their hero had entered the fight and without fail the army rallied and fought harder.

Oshiri
10-23-2006, 08:48 AM
precisely. What i'm getting at is that Zaitzev may not have had anywhere near the kills claimed, but the Soviets would have been all too happy to turn him into their "hero".

PZIV
10-26-2006, 10:25 PM
It was Soviet propoganda yes. It is true he was good, but not near as good as they made him to be.